Abstract
In the conditions of globalisation and the growth of the role of English as a universal means of international communication, effective pedagogical assessment in the process of its study is of particular importance. The combination of conventional and innovative forms of assessment contributed to the development of communicative competence, increasing students’ motivation and readiness for successful activity in an international environment. The purpose of the study was to define and substantiate the types of pedagogical assessment in the process of teaching English, and to reveal their functions, forms, and motivational potential. The research methodology was based on a theoretical analysis of scientific and pedagogical sources, a comparative analysis of approaches to the classification of assessment, and a generalisation of the results of previous studies to develop a systematic vision of its role in the language training of students. As a result of the analysis, it was found that pedagogical assessment performs a controlling, diagnostic, corrective, motivational, developmental, and prognostic function. The forms of assessment were generalised – formative, summative, self-assessment, and mutual assessment – considering their impact on the learning activity of students. It was showed that the use of various tools (testing, project work, electronic portfolios, game and simulation tasks) contributed to increasing the interest and autonomy of students. It was emphasised that motivational potential increases under the condition of transparent criteria, timely feedback, and differentiated tasks. It was determined that an effective assessment system in teaching English should integrate linguistic and professionally oriented parameters, especially in the preparation of students of non-linguistic specialities. The practical significance of the study lied in the possibility of using its provisions by English teachers and methodologists to improve the assessment system, focused on increasing learning motivation and developing foreign language communicative competence of students
Keywords
control; language training; cognitive activity; educational diagnostics; student motivation; language teaching methodology
References
- Alqassab, M., & Panadero, E. (2022). Peer assessment. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781138609877-ree15-1.
- American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Retrieved from https://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/About_AERA/CodeOfEthics(1).pdf.
- Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Longmans Green and Co LTD.
- Bondarenko, H.P. (2021). The project method as a means of stimulating cognitive activity of high school students in Ukrainian language lessons. Spirituality of the Personality: Methodology, Theory and Practice, 102(3), 37-46. doi: 10.33216/2220-6310-2021-102-3-37-46.
- British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-for-Educational-Research_4thEdn_2018.pdf.
- Drychyk, V.V. (2020). Control and assessment of language skills in English classes as a means of enhancing students’ academic activity. Retrieved from https://vseosvita.ua/2-89fz.
- Duesbery, L., & Justice, P. (2024). Aligning formative and summative assessment. doi: 10.3102/ip.24.2097880.
- Dwyer, C.P., & Butler, H.A. (2025). The forgotten role of self-regulation in critical thinking: Conceptualising, teaching and overcoming barriers to critical thinking in real-world settings. In R.J. Sternberg & W. Niu (Eds.), Critical thinking across disciplines (pp. 107-141). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82644-3_5.
- Furtak, E.M. (2022). Formative assessment. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781138609877-ree62-1.
- Hryvko, A., & Vashchenko, L. (2021). Current and formative assessment in basic and senior specialized school. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 2, 72-83. doi: 10.32405/2411-1317-2021-2-72-83.
- International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. (1974). Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/about/conventions/pages/international-convention-for-the-safety-of-life-at-sea-(solas),-1974.aspx.
- Johnson, K. (2025). Summative assessment. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003587262-6.
- Kalynina, I.M. (2021). Formative assessment of higher education students’ academic achievements. Grail of Science, 5, 285-290. doi: 10.36074/grail-of-science.04.06.2021.051.
- Kanecki, P. (2024). Specific pedagogical features of learning a second foreign language: Experience of Central Asian universities. Scientia et Societus, 3(1), 21-30. doi: 10.69587/ss/1.2024.21.
- Krijgsman, C., Borghouts, L., & Mouratidis, A. (2025). Assessment and motivation in physical education. In L. García-González, K. De Cocker & D. González-Cutre (Eds.), Motivation in physical education (pp. 283-303). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-86908-2_14.
- Luzan, P., Titova, O., Mosya, I., & Pashchenko, T. (2021). Methodology for assessing the quality of training specialists in institutions of professional pre-higher education. Professional Pedagogics, 1(22), 169-184. doi: 10.32835/2707-3092.2021.22.169-184.
- Luzan, P.G., Lapa, O.V., Pashchenko, T.M., Mosya, I.A., Vanina, N.M., Yamkovy, O.Yu., & Kalensky, A.A. (2022). Assessment of the quality of training of specialists in institutions of professional pre-higher education in agricultural, construction and machine-building industries. Kyiv: Institute of Vocational Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine. doi: 10.32835/978-61795280-3-3/2022.
- Majeed, R., & Hagger, M.S. (2025). The trans-contextual model of motivation in education: Progress and new directions. In L. García-González, K. De Cocker & D. González-Cutre (Eds.), Motivation in physical education (pp. 53-74). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-86908-2_3.
- Martin-Kniep, G.O. (2022). Portfolio assessment. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781138609877-ree112-1.
- Meier, J.D. (2025). The 13 negative motivation patterns that hold you back. Retrieved from https://sourcesofinsight.com/13-negative-motivation-patterns/.
- Naumenko, S., & Holovko, S. (2023). Diagnostic assessment as a tool for ensuring the quality of general secondary education in the context of European experience and implementation prospects in Ukraine. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 4, 18-31. doi: 10.32405/2411-1317-2022-4-18-31.
- Osvita.ua. (2024). Assessment of learning outcomes of students in grades 5-9 of the New Ukrainian School. Retrieved from https://osvita.ua/school/estimation/89059/.
- Perminova, L., Chastnyk, O., & Diomidova, N. (2024). Comparative analysis of traditional and alternative methods of knowledge assessment of students. Prospects and Innovations of Science, 7(41), 431-442. doi: 10.52058/2786-4952-2024-7(41)-431-442.
- Pučko, Z., & Šuman, N. (2023). Education on construction project management through digital transformation. In Proceedings of the 6th IPMA SENET project management conference “Digital transformation and sustainable development in project management” (pp. 48-59). Dubrovnik: IPMA Publications. doi: 10.5592/ce/senet.2022.4.
- Wiliam, D. (2023). Putting learners at the heart of the assessment system. In C. Harrison, C. Leung & D. Pepper (Eds.), Educational assessment (pp. 29-44). London: Bloomsbury Academic. doi: 10.5040/9781350288522.ch-3.
- Xie, R. (2024). Impact of summative assessment outcomes on formative assessment design in college English education. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(5), 17-24. doi: 10.53469/jssh.2024.6(05).04.
- Xu, J., & Liu, Q. (2025). Uncurtaining windows of motivation, enjoyment, critical thinking, and autonomy in AI-integrated education: Duolingo vs. ChatGPT. Learning and Motivation, 89, article number 102100. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102100.
- Yan, Z., & Yang, L. (2021). Assessment as learning. Maximising opportunities for student learning and achievement. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003052081.