Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”

Vol. 2, No. 2, 2016 open access Open access

Formation of skills of future specialists in primary education to investigate language peculiarity of the work of art

O.M. Fentsyk

Pages 158 –161 Views 898 Views

Abstract

The problem of literary reading lessons organization is relevant in the teaching methodology today. But it should be noted that which ways of literary reading lessons organizing would not be chosen by the teacher, work success determines his understanding of artistic and aesthetic essence of literature as an art of expression. Primary School Teacher must understand not only the verbal art, but also to teach understanding that primary school children to develop their sense of deep awareness of the meaning of art. The article deals with the formation the skills to analyze the linguistic specific of the work of art for primary school teachers The author emphasizes that understanding the artistic and aesthetic essence of literature literary laid during training at high school, and should be based on a sound theoretical basis in understanding the aesthetic nature of literary art. Defines methods of ascertaining the feasibility and art conditionality of the specific word of the literary text; draws attention to the fact that it is enough to process the artistic and expressive tools; clarify their role in the ideological and artistic content of the work and reveal the originality of writer in using linguistic resources. 

Keywords

literary reading, literary education, future primary school teacher, artistic and aesthetic understanding of the essence of literature, art, language specificity of literature, observation, experiment as a techniques of stylistic language analysis

References

References in the process of publication

Suggested citation

O.M. Fentsyk (2016). Formation of skills of future specialists in primary education to investigate language peculiarity of the work of art. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 2(2), 158-161.