Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”

Vol. 11, No. 4, 2025 15.12.2025 open access Open access

Kinaesthetic methodology as a tool for fostering embodied conceptual understanding of physics

Andriy Ryabko, Oleksandr Syzon

DOI https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp4.2025.44 Pages 44 –56 Views 383 Views

Abstract

The problem of overreliance of contemporary physical education on visual methods leads to a neglect of critically important kinaesthetic mental images necessary for deep learning of the natural sciences, in particular physics. The study was grounded in Embodied Cognition Theory and the tenet that core physical concepts are rooted in the primary sensory schema of “effort- resistance-motion”. The purpose of the study was to develop and experimentally verify a kinaesthetic methodology (grounded in embodied cognition) to enhance embodied understanding and bridge the phenomenological gap in students during physics instruction. The research was conducted as a two-year quasi-experimental project in a specialised high school. An experimental group (n = 18) instructed using the kinaesthetic methodology and a control group (n = 22) following the conventional curriculum were established. Methodology integrated three types of kinaesthetic exercises (tactile-motor, spatial-locomotive, and role-play simulations) with the use of the mobile application Phyphox for the immediate objectification of subjective bodily sensations into objective physical data. Effectiveness was assessed using the embodied conceptual understanding assessment scale. The results of the statistical analysis (Student’s t-test) convincingly confirmed the hypothesis: the mean gain score in the experimental group ( X̅ 1 = 7.17) was statistically significantly higher compared to the control group ( X̅ 2 = 5.00), with the calculated t ≈ 7.89 indicating a strong effect size. This disparity was particularly evident in the embodied-kinesthetic component of the embodied conceptual understanding assessment scale. The study demonstrated that the purposeful use of kinaesthetic activity enabled the establishment of resilient mental images that help students consciously modify their intuitive schemas, thereby creating a conceptual ecological system compatible with the scientific worldview. The findings confirmed that the student’s body can serve as an effective “sensor” and a powerful tool for cognition

Keywords

cognition; physics; sensorimotor activation; gap; Phyphox; imagery

References

  1. Acharjee, S.R., Bhattacharaya, A., Hemochandra, L., & Athare, T. (2023). Innovations in teaching: A case of using kinesthetic learning activity for teaching physics. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 59(4), 54-57. doi: 10.48165/IJEE.2023.59411.
  2. Adebisi, T.A., & Feyijimi, T. (2024). Influence of spatial ability levels on the performance and attitude of physics students. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 15-25. doi: 10.56916/ejip.v3i1.476.https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0001617
  3. Badmus, O.T., & Jita, L.C. (2022). Pedagogical ımplication of spatial visualization: A correlate of students’ achievements in physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 97-110. doi: 10.36681/tused.2022.112.
  4. Califf, C.B. (2020). Incorporating kinesthetic learning into university classrooms: An example from management information systems. Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice, 19, 31-45. doi: 10.28945/4527.
  5. Culp, B., Oberlton, M., & Porter, K. (2020). Developing kinesthetic classrooms to promote active learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(6), 10-15. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2020.1768178.
  6. Dale, Z., DeStefano, P.R., Shaaban, L., Siebert, C., & Widenhorn, R. (2020). A step forward in kinesthetic activities for teaching kinematics in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 88(10), 825-830. doi: 10.1119/10.0001617.  
  7. Devy, N.K., Halim, A., Syukri, M., Yusrizal, Y., Nur, S., Khaldun, I., & Saminan, S. (2022). Analysis of understanding physics concepts in terms of students’ learning styles and thinking styles. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 1937-1943. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1926.
  8. Fadlilah, C., Karim, K., & Hartono, S. (2021). Creative thinking ability of visual-dominant and visual-kinesthetic students in solving statistics problems. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP), 2(2), 40-51. doi: 10.26740/jomp.v2n2.p40-51.
  9. Fallace, T. (2023). The long origins of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style typology, 1921-2001. History of Psychology, 26(4), 334-354. doi: 10.1037/hop0000240.
  10. Golon, A.S. (2021). Visual-spatial learners: Understanding the learning style preference of bright but disengaged students (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003239482.
  11. Iqbal, M.Z., & Campbell, A.G. (2023). AGILEST approach: Using machine learning agents to facilitate kinesthetic learning in STEM education through real-time touchless hand interaction. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 9, article number 100034. doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100034.
  12. Jabonete, J., & Mejarito, C. (2023). Integration of kinesthetic approaches in the core academic subjects: A compendium. International Journal of Research Publications, 80(1). doi: 10.47119/IJRP100801720212048.
  13. Kassim, A., & Nordin, M.N. (2024). An effective teaching aids using visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles for students with special needs. Special Education [SE], 2(1) article number e0009. doi: 10.59055/se.v2i1.9.
  14. Legaspino, D., Yanong, C.G., Wenceslao, N., Anino, R.J., Tolin, M., & Caparas, J.T. (2024). Kinesthetic learning approach and process skills in science laboratory activities. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 5(1). doi: 10.35912/jshe.v5i1.2086.
  15. Liu, F., Emerson, G., & Collier, N. (2023). Visual spatial reasoning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11, 635-651. doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00566.
  16. Mahadi, F., Husin, M.R., & Hassan, N.M. (2022). Learning style: Visual, auditory and kinesthetic. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (JHASS), 4(1), 29-36. doi: 10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0401.341.
  17. Marnoufi, K., Ghazlane, I., Soubhi, F.Z., Touri, B., & Aamro, E. (2022). Effect of visuospatial ability on e-learning for pupils of physics option in scientific common trunk. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(11), 192-195. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131121.
  18. Putri, S.E., & Suwarna, I.P. (2020). The experimental study of kinesthetic style student learning outcomes in remedial teaching assisted by projectile motion props. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 25-36. doi: 10.21009/1.06104.
  19. Richards, A.J. (2020). Teaching electricity and magnetism using kinesthetic learning activities. The Physics Teacher, 58(8), 572-576. doi: 10.1119/10.0002380.
  20. Rini, D.S., Adisyahputra, D.V.S., & Sigit, D.V. (2020). Boosting student critical thinking ability through project based learning, motivation and visual, auditory, kinesthetic learning style: A study on ecosystem topic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 37-44. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.081806.
  21. Rosdiana, M.P.M., Muslimin, M., & Firmansyah, F. (2022). The use of visual, auditory, kinesthetic (VAK) learning to increase student learning outcomes. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 2(2), 85-93. doi: 10.30862/inornatus.v2i2.343. 
  22. Saehana, S., Werdhiana, I.K., Safitri, N.S., Saputra, O., & Safira, N. (2021). The analysis of student kinesthetic learning activity on the materials of Compton and photoelectric effects. Journal of Physics: Conference series, 2126, article number 012015. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2126/1/012015.
  23. Sauro, K. (2022). The effects of incorporating kinesthetic learning on learning outcomes and on-task behavior. (Master’s theses, State University of New York College, Cortland, USA).
  24. Setiawati, N., Irene, S., Thomas, O., Alexandro, R., & Putra, K.N. (2023). The effect of visual auditory, kinesthetic learning styles on students’ learning interest at Christian Junior High School. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(2), 466-478. doi: org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.66319.
  25. Simamora, J.A., Iskandar, I., Weda, S., & Tahir, M. (2025). Student’s perceptions and experiences in kinesthetic learning: Challenges and benefits. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 7(1), 15-28. doi: 10.52208/k”lasikal.v7i1.1266.

Suggested citation

Ryabko, A., & Syzon, O. (2025). Kinaesthetic methodology as a tool for fostering embodied conceptual understanding of physics. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 11(4), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp4.2025.44