Анотація
Існують значні проблеми із залученням студентів та дослідників як до навчання, так і до наукових досліджень, і один з факторів, що призводять до такої ситуації, це брак автономії, з яким стикається кожна людина. Ця робота окреслює новий шлях, на якому студенти та дослідники можуть вільно розвивати власні інтереси, а роль викладача або університету полягає в тому, щоб підтримувати й направляти їх. Ця стаття – наративний огляд, у якому розглядалися виклики, з якими стикається освітня галузь і те, як їх можна вирішити за допомогою підприємницької освіти під керівництвом студентів, яка може реалізуватися в режимі онлайн. У статті вивчено наслідки автономії учнів і представлено альтернативні моделі навчання, які можуть бути реалізовані недорого і бути корисними незалежно від самого освітнього процесу. Учнівство, самокерована та проектна педагогіка надає учням навички, необхідні для досягнення успіху в сучасному світі, суттєво відрізняючись від стандартної освіти, актуальність якої для роботодавців знижується. Тоді як наукові установи стикаються з кризою інновацій та пов'язаною з нею кризою суспільної довіри, підприємницька освіта є засобом вирішення цих проблем. Ці зміни мають наслідки на інституційному рівні, а також для відносин між наукою та суспільством. Під час бюджетних криз, як правило, відбувається скорочення обсягів фінансування підприємницької освіти. Робота надає дорожню карту того, як навчальні заклади можуть адаптуватися до кардинальних змін, що відбуваються з онлайн-освітою, а також консультує нових абітурієнтів щодо найкращих практик
Ключові слова
підприємництво в освіті; природничо-наукова освіта; науково-дослідницьке середовище; педагогіка; проєктна освіта
Використані джерела
[1] Akcigit, U., & Ates, S.T. (2021). Ten facts on declining business dynamism and lessons from endogenous growth theory. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 257-298. doi: 10.1257/mac.20180449.
[2] Azoulay, P., Li, D., Zivin, J.S.G., & Sampat, B.N. (2019). Public R&d investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 117-152. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdy034.
[3] Beard, C., & Wilson, J.P. (2018). Experiential learning: A practical guide for training, coaching and education. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
[4] Bjørke, L., & Mordal Moen, K. (2020). Cooperative learning in physical education: A study of students’ learning journey over 24 lessons. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(6), 600-612. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2020.1761955.
[5] Bleemer, Z., Brown, M., Lee, D., Strair, K., & van der Klaauw, W. (2021). Echoes of rising tuition in students’ borrowing, educational attainment, and homeownership in post-recession America. Journal of Urban Economics, 122, article number 103298. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103298.
[6] Bozeman, B. (2022). Use of science in public policy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic efforts to ‘Follow the Science’. Science and Public Policy, 49(5), 806-817. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scac026.
[7] Brookfield, S.D. (2009). Self-directed learning. In International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 2615-2627). Berlin: Springer.
[8] Carnevale, A.P., Fasules, M.L., & Peltier Campbell, K. (2020). Workplace basic: The competencies employers want. Retrieved from https://theqacommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020-Workplace-Basics-The-Competencies-Employers-Want-Georgetown-CEW.pdf.
[9] Chakraborty, P., Mittal, P., Gupta, M.S., Yadav, S., & Arora, A. (2021). Opinion of students on online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 357-365. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.240.
[10] Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009). Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet, 374(9683), 86-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9.
[11] Chirikov, I., Semenova, T., Maloshonok, N., Bettinger, E., & Kizilcec, R.F. (2020). Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost. Science Advances, 6(15), article number eaay5324.
[12] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
[13] Digest of Education Statistics. (2023). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_330.10.asp.
[14] Funk, C. (2021). What the public really thinks about scientists: Surveys show a desire for greater transparency and accountability in research. American Scientist, 109(4), 196-198. doi: 10.1511/2021.109.4.196.
[15] Gooding, P. (2022). Consumer price inflation, UK: May 2022. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/bulletins/consumerpriceinflation/may2022.
[16] Gorzycki, M., Howard, P., Allen, D., Desa, G., & Rosegard, E. (2016). An exploration of academic reading proficiency at the university level: A cross-sectional study of 848 undergraduates. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(2), 142-162. doi: 10.1080/19388071.2015.1133738.
[17] Hakim, S.M., & Meissen, G. (2013). Increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables in the school cafeteria: The influence of active choice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 24(2), 145-157. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0109.
[18] Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M.A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.
[19] Halma, M.T.J., & Guetzkow, J. (2023). Public health needs the public trust: A pandemic retrospective. BioMed, 3(2), 256-271. doi: 10.3390/biomed3020023.
[20] Hanson, M. (2023). Average student loan debt. Education Data Initiative. Retrieved from https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-statistics.
[21] Harambam, J., & Voss, E. (2023). The Corona truth wars: Epistemic disputes and societal conflicts around a pandemic ̶ An introduction to the special issue. Minerva, 61(3), 299-313. doi: 10.1007/s11024-023-09511-1.
[22] Haubenstock, K.T., Lawrence, J., & Haubenstock, L. (n.d.). Soft skills in the life sciences. Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/soft-skills-in-the-life-sciences/.
[23] Huebner, J. (2005). A possible declining trend for worldwide innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8), 980-986. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.01.003.
[24] Impey, C., Buxner, S., Antonellis, J., Johnson, E., & King, C. (2011). A twenty-year survey of science literacy among college undergraduates. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 31-37. doi: 10.2505/3/jcst11_040_04.
[25] Intemann, K. (2023). Science communication and public trust in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 48(2), 350-365. doi: 10.1080/03080188.2022.2152244.
[26] Jabrane, L. (2022). Individual excellence funding: Effects on research autonomy and the creation of protected spaces. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(382). doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01404-0.
[27] Jacob, F. (1995). The statue within: An autobiography. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
[28] Jefferson, T., et al. (2023). Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
[29] Johnson, V.E. (2006). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[30] Kalutkiewicz, M.J., & Ehman, R.L. (2014). Patents as proxies: NIH hubs of innovation. Nature Biotechnology, 32(6), 536-537. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2917.
[31] Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267-277. doi: 10.1177/1365480216659.
[32] Kumano, M. (2018). On the concept of well-being in Japan: Feeling shiawase as hedonic well-being and feeling ikigai as eudaimonic well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13, 419-433. doi: 10.1007/S11482-017-9532-9.
[33] Lee, S., Barker, T., & Kumar, V.S. (2016). Effectiveness of a learner-directed model for e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 221-233.
[34] Levanon, G. (2022). U.S. Labor Market Outlook November 2022. Retrieved from https://www.burningglassinstitute.org/research/us-labor-market-outlook-november-2022.
[35] Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893-1894. doi: 10.1126/science.1132362.
[36] Looi, M.-K. (2023). Did Covid-19 come from a lab leak in China? BMJ, 382, article number p1556. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p1556.
[37] Macleod, M.R., et al. (2014). Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. The Lancet, 383(9912), 101-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6.
[38] Marken, S. (2019). Half in U.S. now consider college education very important. Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/education/272228/half-consider-college-education-important.aspx.
[39] Masters, B., & Thiel, P. (2014). Zero to one: Notes on startups, or how to build the future. New York: Penguin Random House Company.
[40] Miri, J. (2021). The fall of vannevar bush: The forgotten war for control of science policy in postwar America. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 51(4), 507-541. doi: 10.1525/hsns.2021.51.4.507.
[41] Muehlemann, S., & Wolter, S.C. (2014). Return on investment of apprenticeship systems for enterprises: Evidence from cost-benefit analyses. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3, 1-22. doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-3-25.
[42] National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_303.70.asp.
[43] Niemczyk, E.K., & Rónay, Z. (2023). Roles, requirements and autonomy of academic researchers. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(2), 327-341. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12403.
[44] Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R.J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613, 138-144. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x
[45] Paula, F. de O., & Silva, J.F.d. (2021). R&D spending and patents: Levers of national development. Innovation & Management Review, 18(2), 175-191. doi: 10.1108/INMR-11-2019-0142.
[46] Pew Research Center. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/.
[47] Piché-Renaud, P.-P., Morris, S.K., & Top, K.A. (2023). A narrative review of vaccine pharmacovigilance during mass vaccination campaigns: Focus on myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 89(3), 967-981. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15625.
[48] Ratcliffe, M.M., Merrigan, K.A., Rogers, B.L., & Goldberg, J.P. (2011). The effects of school garden experiences on middle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice, 12(1), 36-43. doi: 10.1177/1524839909349182.
[49] Shir-Raz, Y., Elisha, E., Martin, B., Ronel, N., & Guetzkow, J. (2016). Singapore introduces daily cleaning duties for students. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-news-from-elsewhere-35661412.
[50] Sorgman, M., & Parkison, K. (2008). The future is now: Preparing K-12 teachers and students for an entrepreneurial society. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 11, 75-86.
[51] Stehlik, T. (2019). Steiner education: The growth of a worldwide movement. In T. Stehlik (Ed.), Waldorf schools and the history of Steiner education: An International view of 100 Years (pp. 67-93). New York: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31631-0_4.
[52] Stringham, E.P. (2001). Kaldor-Hicks efficiency and the problem of central planning. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4(2), 41-50.
[53] Tanne, J.H. (2023). US spends more than twice as much on health as similar countries for worse outcomes, finds report. BMJ, 383, article number p2340. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2340.
[54] Toole, A.A. (2012). The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 41(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.004.
[55] Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. del C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M.B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009-2018). Sustainability, 12(12), article number 5153. doi: 10.3390/su12125153.
[56] van Mook, W.N., et al. (2010). Bad apples spoil the barrel: Addressing unprofessional behaviour. Medical Teacher, 32(11), 891-898. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.497823.
[57] van Nieuwerburgh, C., & Barr, M. (2017). Coaching in education. The SAGE handbook of coaching. London: Routledge.
[58] Weingart, P., & Guenther, L. (2016). Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science Communication, 15(05), article number C01. doi: 10.22323/2.15050301.
[59] Wolter, S.C., & Mühlemann, S. (2015). Apprenticeship training in Spain – A cost effective model for firms. doi: 10.11586/2016011.
[60] Yanai, I., & Lercher, M.J. (2023). Make science disruptive again. Nature Biotechnology, 41, 450-451. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01736-5.
[61] Yegros-Yegros, A., Rafols, I., & D’Este, P. (2015). Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity. Plos One, 10(8), article number e0135095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135095.
[62] Yin, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Wang, D., & Jones, B.F. (2022). Public use and public funding of science. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10), 1344-1350. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01397-5\.
[63] Yordanova, Z. (2022). Lean startup as a project management method in science organizations. In M. Botto-Tobar, S. Montes León, P. Torres-Carrión, M. Zambrano Vizuete, & B. Durakovic (Eds.), Applied echnologies (pp. 165-175). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-03884-6_12.
[64] Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1202728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728.